A final-minute intervention by the European Court of Human Rights — which determined there was “an actual threat of irreversible hurt’’ to the asylum seekers concerned — compelled the cancellation
A final-minute intervention by the European Court of Human Rights — which determined there was “an actual threat of irreversible hurt’’ to the asylum seekers concerned — compelled the cancellation
Britain has cancelled its first deportation flight to Rwanda after a last-minute intervention by the European Court of Human Rights, which determined there was “a real risk of irreversible harm’’ to the asylum seekers involved.
The flight had been scheduled to leave Tuesday evening but lawyers for the asylum seekers launched a flurry of case-by-case appeals seeking to block the deportation of everyone on the government’s list.
Foreign Secretary Liz Truss had said earlier in the day that the plane would take off no matter how many people were on board. But after the appeals, no one remained.
The decision to scrap the Tuesday flight caps three days of frantic court challenges as immigration rights advocates and labor unions sought to stop the deportations. The leaders of the Church of England joined the opposition, calling the government’s policy “immoral.”
Earlier within the day, British Prime Minister Boris Johnson had emphatically defended the plan. “We are going to get on and deliver” the plan, Johnson declared, arguing that the transfer is a reliable solution to shield lives and thwart the legal gangs that smuggle migrants throughout the English Channel in small boats.
The Prime Minister introduced an settlement with Rwanda in April through which individuals who entered Britain illegally could be deported to the East African nation. In trade for accepting them, Rwanda would obtain tens of millions of kilos ({dollars}) in improvement help. The deportees could be allowed to use for asylum in Rwanda, not Britain.
Opponents have argued that it’s unlawful and inhumane to ship individuals hundreds of miles to a rustic they don’t wish to reside in. Britain lately has seen an unlawful inflow of migrants from such locations as Syria, Afghanistan, Iran, Sudan, Iraq and Yemen.
Activists have denounced the coverage as an assault on the rights of refugees that almost all international locations have acknowledged for the reason that finish of World War II.
Politicians in Denmark and Austria are contemplating related proposals. Australia has operated an asylum-processing middle within the Pacific island nation of Nauru since 2012.
Source: www.thehindu.com
